This across the transom today: Kamala Harris is not the favored candidate of our nation’s sex workers.
Why? She has a history of supporting legislation that either reinforces outright bans on their trade, or otherwise makes it more difficult.
It has been said that social conservatives want to ban sex work because it involves sex, while left-wingers want to ban sex work because it involves money. This might not be too far from the truth. In any event, the legalization of sex work has few advocates among either of our two major political parties.
One can easily make the case that in a perfect world, no women would be sex workers, and no men would be their clients. In a less than perfect world, however, we allow emancipated adults to make their own choices–even when they make the wrong ones.
You might ask: Would you want your daughter to be a sex worker? I won’t dodge that question. The answer is a resounding “NO”. But it’s also true that I wouldn’t want my (hypothetical) daughter to drink alcohol, smoke cigarettes, cohabitate with a man before marriage, or vote Democrat.
Now, are you really sure that you want to use my aspirations for a daughter of my own as a basis for the law?
The law should not be about what we would want for our daughters, but what the state has a right to ban and regulate. And that answer is always: as little as absolutely necessary.